Cefuroxime (Ceftin) versus Other Antibiotics
- Cefuroxime vs Ceftriaxone
- Cefuroxime vs Cefdinir
- Cefuroxime vs Cephalexin
- Cefuroxime vs Cefaclor
- Cefuroxime vs Cefixime
- Cefuroxime vs Cefadroxil
- Cefuroxime vs Azithromycin
- Cefuroxime vs Clarithromycin
- Cefuroxime vs Levofloxacin
- Cefuroxime vs Ofloxacin
Based on "Antibiotic and Chemotherapy"
written by Roger G. Finch
Acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis
Cefdinir and cefuroxime provide comparable efficacy and tolerability.
Results of study comparing cefdinir and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis 15. | Cefuroxime | Cefdinir |
---|---|---|
Regimen | 250 mg twice daily for 10 days | 600 mg once per day for 10 days |
Microbiologic eradication rates by pathogen | 88% |
90% |
Clinical response rates by patient | 80% |
81% |
Side effects | diarrhea the most frequent complaint | diarrhea the most frequent complaint |
Skin or skin structure infections
Results of comparison of cefuroxime axetil and cephalexin in primary infections of the skin or skin structures 13. | Cefuroxime | Cephalexin |
---|---|---|
Regimen | 250 mg twice daily for 10 days | 500 mg twice daily for 10 days |
Satisfactory clinical outcome (cure or improvement) rate | 97% (89 of 92 patients) |
89% (80 of 90 patients) |
Eradication of the bacterial pathogens rate | 96% (69 of 72 patients) |
85% (60 of 71 patients) |
Acute Otitis Media
Cefaclor and cefuroxime axetil are equally effective in the treatment of acute otitis media with effusion.
Results of comparison of cefaclor and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute otitis media with effusion in children 14. | Cefuroxime | Cefaclor |
---|---|---|
Clinical success rate | 89.1% (96 of 101 patients) |
92.3% (96 of 104 patients) |
Favorable clinical outcomes at day 10-16 after completion of therapy | 83.2% (84 of 101 patients) |
82.7% (86 of 104 patients) |
Percentage of patients, reported at least one adverse event | 35.6% (36 of 101 patients) diarrhea in 11 (10.9%) patients rhinitis in 10 (9.9%) patients |
30.8% (32 of 104 patients) rhinitis in 9 (8.7%) patients cough increased in 7 (6.7%) patients |
Bronchitis
Cefuroxime axetil is as effective as cefixime in the treatment of acute bronchitis. Cefuroxime produces fewer gastrointestinal side effects, particularly diarrhea.
Results of clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil with cefixime for acute bronchitis 5. | Cefuroxime | Cefixime |
---|---|---|
Dosage | 250 mg twice daily, 10 days |
400 mg once daily, 10 days |
Satisfactory clinical outcome (cure or improvement) rate | 88% |
91% |
Gastrointestinal adverse effects | 10% |
18% |
Acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis
Cefuroxime eradicates S. pneumoniae significantly more rapidly than cefixime.
Results of double-blind, randomised study comparing cefuroxime axetil versus cefixime for bacteriological eradication of Streptococcus pneumoniae from patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis 18. | Cefuroxime | Cefixime |
---|---|---|
S. pneumoniae eradication | significantly more rapidly |
|
Response rates | 94% |
71% |
Skin infections
Cefuroxime axetil may be more effective than cafadroxil for the treatment of skin or skin structure infections in children.
Results of randomized, single-blind, multicenter study evaluating cefuroxime axetil and cefadroxil for skin or skin structure infections in children 8. | Cefuroxime | Cefadroxil |
---|---|---|
Regimen | 30 mg/kg per day in 2 divided doses | 30 mg/kg per day in 2 divided doses |
Satisfactory bacteriological response (cure or presumed cure) rate | 97.1% |
94.3% |
Satisfactory clinical responses (cure or improvement) rate | 97.8% |
90.3% |
Edverse effects rate | 7.9% |
6.1% |
Number of patients who refused to take medication | 7 of 189 children |
0 of 98 children |
Community-acquired pneumonia
Results of international, randomized, open-label study of azithromycin sequential therapy vs standard cefuroxime sequential therapy in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia 19. | Cefuroxime | Azithromycin |
---|---|---|
Regimen | 1.5 g intravenously 3 times daily for 1-4 days followed by 500 mg orally twice daily for 7 days | 500 mg intravenously once daily for 1-4 days followed by 500 mg orally once daily for 3 days |
Clinical efficacy rate | 82% (73 of 89 patients) |
81.7% (67 of 82 patients) |
Duration of total therapy | 10.1 days |
6.2 days |
Adverse events rate | 29.7% |
38.2% |
Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Both azithromycin and cefuroxime are effective for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Azithromycin has a lower rate of side effects.
Results of randomized comparative study of azithromycin and cefuroxime in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 11. | Acetyl Cefuroxime | Azithromycin |
---|---|---|
Regimen | 500 mg twice daily for 10 days | 500 mg per day for 3 days |
Evolution of the symptoms | similar, although with a trend to greater improvement in azithromycin grope |
|
Functional and gasometric evolution | similar |
|
Number of patients required hospital admission | 5 of 51 patients |
3 of 50 patients |
Sinusitis
Cefuroxime and clarithromycin are equally effective in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis.
Results of randomised, double-blind, multicentre study comparing cefuroxime axetil and clarithromycin 2. | Cefuroxime | Clarithromycin |
---|---|---|
Regimen | 250 mg twice daily for 10 days |
250 mg twice daily for 10 days |
Number of patients cured/improved at post-treatment | 169 of 185 patients (91%) |
172 of 185 patients (93%) |
Reduction in incidence of air fluid level and/or opacification | from 96% to 15% |
from 96% to 11% |
Decrease in frequency of mucosal thickening | from 58% to 28% |
from 56% to 29% |
Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD)
Results of randomized, controlled trial was comparing levofloxacin with cefuroxime axetil in patients with AECOPD 6 | Cefuroxime | Levofloxacin |
---|---|---|
Regimen | 250-500 mg twice daily for 7 days |
500 mg daily for 7 days |
Clinical efficacy rate | 90.6% |
90.4% |
Microbiologic response rate | higher in the levofloxacin group |
Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive bronchitis (AECOB)
Cefuroxime and levofloxacin have similar efficacy in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive bronchitis.
Results of randomised, open-label study of levofloxacin and cefuroxime in patients experiencing AECOB episodes 10 | Cefuroxime | Levofloxacin |
---|---|---|
Regimen | 250 mg twice daily for 10 days | 500 mg once daily for 10 days |
Clinical cure rates at test of cure | 93.8% |
94.6% |
The probability that 25% of patients would relapse during follow-up was reached | within 81 days |
within 93 days |
Possibly related treatment-emergent adverse events | 2.9% |
5.0% |
Acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis
Levofloxacin is at least as effective as cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.
Results randomized, double-blind study of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis 7 | Cefuroxime | Levofloxacin |
---|---|---|
Regimen | 250 mg twice daily for 7-10 days | 250 mg or 500 mg daily for 7-10 days |
Cure rates in the intention-to-treat population | 61% (166 of 271 patients) | 70% (196 of 281 patients) 70% (195 of 280 patients) |
Cure rates in the per-protocol population | 66% (88 of 134 patients) | 78% (121 of 156 patients) 79% (108 of 137 patients) |
Community-acquired pneumonia
Oral levofloxacin is less expensive than oral cefuroxime axetil for treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia 4.
Results of randomised, open-label study of levofloxacin and cefuroxime in patients experiencing AECOB episodes 4 | Cefuroxime | Levofloxacin |
---|---|---|
Regimen | 250 mg twice daily for 10 days | 500 mg once daily for 10 days |
Clinical cure rates at test of cure | 93.8% |
94.6% |
The probability that 25% of patients would relapse during follow-up was reached | within 81 days |
within 93 days |
Possibly related treatment-emergent adverse events | 2.9% |
5.0% |
Sinusitis
Levofloxacin may be more effective than cefuroxime for the treatment of sinusitis.
Results of comparison of levofloxacin and cefuroxime for the treatment of sinusitis 3 | Cefuroxime | Levofloxacin |
---|---|---|
Regimen | 250 mg twice daily for 10 to 14 days | 200 mg once daily, 200/100 mg twice daily for 10 to 14 days |
Success rates after the end of treatment | 92.8% |
97.4% |
Resolution rates of bacteria | 80.0% |
91.6% |
Urinary Tract Infections (UTI)
Ofloxacin may be somewhat more effective than cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of urinary tract infections in women.
Results of multicentre study of cefuroxime axetil versus ofloxacin for acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections in women 9 | Cefuroxime | Ofloxacin |
---|---|---|
Regimen | 125 mg twice daily for 3 days | 100 mg twice daily for 3 days |
Clinical cure and improvement | 84.8% (56 of 66 patients) |
95.2% (59 of 62 patients) |
Eliminated bacteriuria 7-9 days after therapy | 80.3% (53 of 66 patients) |
89.1% (57 of 64 patients) |
Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis
Cefuroxime axetil has better efficacy and lower risk of side effects than ofloxacin.
Results of randomized comparative study of cefuroxime axetil versus ofloxacin for acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis 1 | Cefuroxime | Ofloxacin |
---|---|---|
Regimen | 500 mg twice daily for 7-8 days | 200 mg twice daily for 7-8 days |
Cure rate | 75% |
50% |
Tolerability | treatment was terminated in 2 cases due to side effects |
- 1. Kleckow M. Multicenter, randomized comparative study of cefuroxime axetil versus ofloxacin. Fortschr Med. 1991 Jul 30;109(22):450-4. PubMed
- 2. Stefansson P, Jacovides A, Jablonicky P, Sedani S, Staley H. Cefuroxime axetil versus clarithromycin in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis. Rhinology. 1998 Dec;36(4):173-8. PubMed
- 3. Li XP, Qin ZM, Zheng RH, Tan QL, Zhou YY, Zhu L, Yin AF. Comparison of the effectiveness of levofloxacin and cefuroxime for the treatment of sinusitis. PubMed
- 4. Rittenhouse BE, Stinnett AA, Dulisse B, Henke CJ, Potter L, Parasuraman B, Martens LL, Williams RR, Kojak C. An economic evaluation of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the outpatient treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Manag Care. 2000 Mar;6(3):381-9. PubMed
- 5. Arthur M, McAdoo M, Guerra J, Maloney R, McCluskey D, Giguere G, Gomez G, Collins JJ. Clinical Comparison of Cefuroxime Axetil with Cefixime in the Treatment of Acute Bronchitis. Am J Ther. 1996 Sep;3(9):622-629. PubMed
- 6. Yoon HI, Lee CH, Kim DK, Park GM, Lee SM, Yim JJ, Kim JY, Lee JH, Lee CT, Chung HS, Kim YW, Han SK, Yoo CG. Efficacy of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:329-34. PubMed
- 7. Shah PM1, Maesen FP, Dolmann A, Vetter N, Fiss E, Wesch R. Levofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: results of a randomized, double-blind study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Apr;43(4):529-39. PubMed
- 8. Jacobs RF, Brown WD, Chartrand S, Darden P, Drehobl MA, Yetman R, Ossi MJ. Evaluation of cefuroxime axetil and cefadroxil suspensions for treatment of pediatric skin infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Aug;36(8):1614-8. PubMed
- 9. Naber KG, Koch EM. Cefuroxime axetil versus ofloxacin for short-term therapy of acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections in women. Infection. 1993 Jan-Feb;21(1):34-9. PubMed
- 10. Petitpretz P, Chone C, Tremolieres F; Investigator Study Group. Levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive bronchitis: clinical efficacy and exacerbation-free interval. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007 Jul;30(1):52-9. PubMed
- 11. Alvarez Gutie'rrez FJ, Soto Campos G, del Castillo Otero D, Sa'nchez Go'mez J, Caldero'n Osuna E, Rodri'guez Becerra E, Castillo Go'mez J. A randomized comparative study of 3 days of azithromycin and 10 days of cefuroxime in exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Med Clin (Barc). 1999 Jul 3;113(4):124-8. PubMed
- 13. Gooch WM 3rd, Kaminester L, Cole GW, et al. Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil, cephalexin and cefadroxil in patients with primary infections of the skin or skin structures. Dermatologica. 1991;183(1):36-43. PubMed
- 14. Turik MA, Johns D Jr. Comparison of cefaclor and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute otitis media with effusion in children. J Chemother. 1998 Aug;10(4):306-12. PubMed
- 15. Van Herwaarden CL, Langan CE, Siemon G, Rudolph C, Keyserling CH, Nemeth MA, Tack KJ. International study comparing cefdinir and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Int J Infect Dis. 2000;4(1):26-33. PubMed
- 18. Zuck P, Petitpretz P, Geslin P, Rio Y, Leblanc F. Bacteriological eradication of Streptococcus pneumoniae from patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: cefuroxime axetil versus cefixime. Int J Clin Pract. 1999 Sep;53(6):437-43. PubMed
- 19. Kuzman I1, Daković-Rode O, Oremus M, Banaszak AM. Clinical efficacy and safety of a short regimen of azithromycin sequential therapy vs standard cefuroxime sequential therapy in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: an international, randomized, open-label study. J Chemother. 2005 Dec;17(6):636-42. PubMed
Published: March 31, 2008
Last reviewed: February 17, 2017